Andrea de Cesaris vs Ukyo Katayama

1993·

Andrea de Cesaris and Ukyo Katayama finished level 8–8 on race day at Tyrrell in 1993. Andrea de Cesaris took qualifying 10–6. They finished level on 0 points.

Andrea de CesarisUkyo Katayama

10Qualifying6

16 shared races

8Race day8

16 shared races

0Points0

in shared races, as awarded at the time

1Points (today’s rules)1

in shared races, rescored 25-18-15…

Wins: 0/0
Podiums: 0/0
Poles: 0/0
Retirements: 10/11
Best finish: P10/P10
Avg. grid: 20.2/21.4

Race by race

Round-by-round comparison of Andrea de Cesaris and Ukyo Katayama
R	Grand Prix	Grid	Andrea de Cesaris	Ukyo Katayama	Points
1	1South African Grand Prix	23/21	Transmission	Transmission	0 / 0
2	2Brazilian Grand Prix	23/22	Fuel system	Spun off	0 / 0
3	3European Grand Prix	25/18	Gearbox	Clutch	0 / 0
4	4San Marino Grand Prix	18/22	Gearbox	Engine	0 / 0
5	5Spanish Grand Prix	24/23	Disqualified	Spun off	0 / 0
6	6Monaco Grand Prix	19/22	P10	Engine	0 / 0
7	7Canadian Grand Prix	19/22	Spun off	P17	0 / 0
8	8French Grand Prix	25/24	P15	Gearbox	0 / 0
9	9British Grand Prix	21/22	Not classified	P13	0 / 0
10	10German Grand Prix	19/21	Gearbox	Halfshaft	0 / 0
11	11Hungarian Grand Prix	22/23	P11	P10	0 / 0
12	12Belgian Grand Prix	17/23	Engine	P15	0 / 0
13	13Italian Grand Prix	18/17	P13	P14	0 / 0
14	14Portuguese Grand Prix	17/21	P12	Spun off	0 / 0
15	15Japanese Grand Prix	18/24	Collision	Engine	0 / 0
16	16Australian Grand Prix	15/18	P13	Spun off	0 / 0
	Average finish		P12.3	P13.8

How to read this table

The driver ahead in a round is shown in bold, the other in grey. Grid shows Andrea de Cesaris / Ukyo Katayama.
P1 a win,P3 a podium,DNF a retirement.
▲ a finish at least 4 places better than that driver’s own average finish this season (see the average row), ▼ at least 4places worse. Retirements are not counted in the average.

Andrea de Cesaris’s career Ukyo Katayama’s career Tyrrell 1993 season All teammate battles

How these numbers are calculated

Only races both drivers started are counted. Entries that did not qualify, did not pre-qualify or were withdrawn are excluded, as are cars that never left the grid or the garage, and the Indianapolis 500 of 1950–1960.
Until the mid-1960s drivers could share a car during a race. Each driver is compared from the car they started (which sets their grid position), with the best result of any car they drove and the points from all of them, as officially credited.
Qualifying is compared on grid position rather than session times. Session-by-session qualifying data only exists from 1994, while grid position is recorded for over 99% of entries right back to 1950 — including every race of the 1950s, 60s and 70s.
On race day the driver classified ahead takes the round. If neither was classified, the one who completed more laps is credited; if both retired on the same lap it is scored as a tie and excluded from the tally.
Points are those awarded at the time and include sprint races from 2021. Where the season used an older system, a second points row rescores every round under the current system so seasons from different eras can be compared.
These are points scored in the races both drivers started, not their season totals: races either missed, or contested alongside a different teammate, are left out. Up to 1990 even full-season totals differ from the championship standings, because only a driver’s best results counted towards the title. In 1988 Alain Prost outscored Ayrton Senna 105 to 94 and still lost the championship. Theseason page has the final standings.